How and Why I Voted in This Election

Vatzian Ballot -- Selected

This annotated list of some of my votes yesterday should not be taken as a Red Maryland endorsement; it is only one Red Maryland blogger's votes. This comprises votes only on matters on which I believe I have at least some limited expertise.

The strongest democratic (small "d") opinion I have is that the almost universal plea for everyone to vote is motivated by either naïvete or bad intentions.  If you have no idea why you're voting for whom you're voting, or what the arguments are for and against a Constitutional amendment, a referendum or an ordinance, you shouldn't vote. Democrats always want to expand the electorate to include the quick and the dead. Very early voting (weeks and months ahead of elections), incidentally,  is undemocratic.

That said, here are some of my votes, some with a short annotation:

President and Vice President: MITT ROMNEY and PAUL RYAN.  I have done so many commentaries on this on radio and television and a few in print, but if people want to re-elect an attractive, articulate manifest failure in economic, tax and foreign policy who almost never discusses anything but Gov. Romney's alleged personal weaknesses and cute names for them (e.g., "Romnesia"), they deserve to have him as president.  But the rest of us don't deserve another four years of economic decline and foreign policy weakness.

The rest of my ticket is mostly Republicans with a Democrat here or there.  I am not going to particularize, as I do from time to time moderate debates between these candidates.

Question 3, "Suspension and Removal of Elected Officials," an amendment which "changes the point at which an elected official charged with certain crimes is suspended or removed from office." FOR:  Red Maryland's endorsement says it all.

Question 4, "The Dream Act Referendum." AGAINST:  As moderate Democratic Sen. Jim Brochin puts it, this is just "bad public policy." Maryland should not subsidize the fruits of illegal immigration. The argument is made that the children of such illegals have done nothing wrong, but in what aspect of law do we allow people to enjoy the benefits of illegal activities wherein it is preventable? Finally, of course, this referendum does not prevent the acquiring of an education; it stops the state's special financial reinforcement for those who are here illegally.

Question 5, "Referendum Petition Congressional Redistricting Plan." AGAINST: The partisan political expediency in this gerrymandering bill is almost beyond belief.

Question 6, "Civil Marriage Protection Act." FOR:  Close call, and I understand the sincere arguments against it, including the possibility of irresponsible educational and media support for depicting to small, confusable children gay marriage as a viable life choice. Notwithstanding, I cannot vote to deny the right of gay men and women to marry. I think such a vote is wrong: understandable, but wrong.

Question 7, "Gaming Expansion."  AGAINST: The utter hypocrisy of some Question 7-supporting politicians who argued all during the Ehrlich administration that legalizing just slots was morally repugnant is numbing to me.  But this doesn't motivate my vote on the matter.  I do think that these arguments: 1. that there is no evidence that money will actually go to education and 2. that not one voter in 1000 knows how much money already goes to education, where it is targeted in education or how much is enough -- these points are sufficient to warrant my "NO" vote.

Happy election week.

Those who wish in an adult way to tell me why they agree or disagree with my votes or reasoning are invited to indicate so here or at revatz@hotmail.com.



Red Maryland

The Premier blog of conservative and Republican politics and ideas in the Free State, named one of Maryland's best political blogs by the Washington Post.

Professor Vatz teaches political persuasion at Towson University and is the author of The Only Authentic Book of Persuasion (Kendall Hunt, 2012, 2013)

This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

Paul Romney November 04, 2012 at 12:12 PM
I find your reasons for voting for Ryan/Romney politically unpersuasive. Not to mention untrue. We simply haven't had four years of economic decline or foreign policy weakness. However, since your idea of political persuasion appears to amount to the assertion of untruths, I can see why you voted for Romney/Ryan.
Frank/FIFA/Steve November 05, 2012 at 01:44 AM
Omg! Did you just refer to someone as a sellout kittens? How unmetropolitan of you. You get by in life by being an operative of the democratic party spending all day and night posting on sites for money then accuse someone of being a sellout. We all know why you use multiple accounts and many different names to post.
Michelle L November 05, 2012 at 02:40 AM
Jim Brochin is a Republican in Democrat's clothing. And Question 6 has nothing to do with what is taught in schools, but guess what, gay marriage should be a viable life choice for anyone who is gay.
ALan Z. Forman November 05, 2012 at 06:18 AM
Kudos for standing up for your views! No doubt you're getting plenty of criticism for your election choices, but it's all good: Your columns are always proactive and thought provoking, whether the reader agrees with you or not. My commentary on this blog -- http://voiceofbaltimore.org/archives/6436 -- is intended to be proactive, objective and prognosticative as well, and I've been getting flak from everybody! Managing Editor Voice of Baltimore
address0 November 05, 2012 at 11:31 AM
After Scots and Frisian come http://www.outletcoachstoday.com those Germanic languages http://www.coachoutletod.com/ that are more distantly related: the http://www.coachs-outletcar.com non-Anglo-Frisian West Germanic http://www.coachoutletdp.com languages (Dutch, Afrikaans, Low German, http://www.coachoutletwo.com High German), and the http://www.coachfactoryoutletsp.com North Germanic languages (Swedish, Danish, Norwegian, http://www.coachfactoryoutletli.net Icelandic, and Faroese). With the (partial) exception of Scots, http://www.coachfactoryoutletce.org none of the other languages is mutually http://www.coachoutletonlinelc.net intelligible with http://www.coachoutletonlinesc.com English, owing http://www.coachoutletonlinelsa.com in part to http://www.louisvuittonoutletct.com the divergences in lexis, syntax, http://www.louisvuittonoutletti.org semantics, and phonology, http://www.coachoutletrf.com and to the isolation http://www.coachfactoryonlinebp.com afforded to the English http://www.coachoutletuser.net language by the British Isles


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »