Baltimore County police said they have, effective immediately, stopped collecting DNA samples from suspects arrested and charged with certain violent crimes.
The policy switch comes after Maryland Court of Appeals ruled Tuesday that part of a state law that allows law enforcement to collect DNA from anyone arrested for a crime of violence is unconstitutional. The case overturned a rape conviction and life sentence.
The court ruled in a 5-2 vote that Wicomico County police violated Fourth Amendment rights, restricting unreasonable searches, when Alonzo J. King Jr. was arrested in 2009 and police took a sample of his DNA, according to court documents.
Despite the move by the Baltimore County police, Chief James Johnson, , is hopeful the court’s decision will eventually be turned over on appeal.
“Our job is public safety, and DNA collection is an invaluable tool for helping us protect citizens from criminals,” Johnson said in a statement. “I have serious concerns about this ruling.”
According to a Baltimore County news release, Johnson is still instructing officers to note the suspects’ eligibility to collect DNA on their arrest reports to make it easier to gather such samples in the future, should the ruling be reversed on appeal.
Johnson, the release continued, believes DNA collections from arrested suspects have led to many key arrests.
In 2010, according to the release, a 42-year-old man was convicted of a 2004 rape of a 13-year-old and a 2000 rape of a 14-year-old.
Police gained DNA evidence from that case in February 2009, when the man was arrested for the sexual assault of his 7- and 8-year-old female cousins, according to the release.
“We got this criminal off the streets for good,” Johnson said in a statement. “Without the DNA evidence, it’s possible that we would not have been able to do that.”
And isn't an assault charge a crime of violence by definition?
Not only a smart decision by the Court, but the right decision as well.
The decision to halt the use of it cripples the law enforcement agencies and lets the criminals get away with murder. Just hope the supporters don't have to deal with the repercussions.We all will until it is overturned.Very bad decision.Never heard of any abuse using DNA only that it caught the right people.Hardly abuse asking someone to take a DNA test if it protects the public.Unfortunately,many of these supporters have no idea what goes on in the law enforcement field.I am for only protecting the law abidding citizens not the ones who prey on us.
It's been great hearing how the general public feels, and I sincerely hope that Justice will be served. One High Court ruling never settles anything, so, we'll just have to see how it all plays out in the days to come. My only hope is that the Guilty will not go free, and that the Innocent will remain free.
I am still of the belief that better training of all law enforcement regarding Constitutional matters will improve the quality of life that is challenged by hard core, intentional criminals. We will never bat a thousand, we're only human beings..
Great question A.K. what did happen ? 6 swabs taken..2 possible matching hits...4 that did not match. Could someone please explain this?
"You have an absolute right to refuse a breathalyzer test" ? Only if you don't want to drive anymore.