Lawmakers Seek Answers on Essex Skypark's Future
A bipartisan group of state legislators that represent the Essex-Middle River community are concerned about the county's push to close the 70-year-old airport.
A bipartisan group of state lawmakers is demanding answers from Baltimore County officials about its decision to force the Essex Skypark to move.
District 7 Dels. Pat McDonough and Rick Impallaria have filed legislation that would prohibit Baltimore County from taking control of the skypark and would guarantee the facility would continue to operate.
McDonough, a Middle River Republican, said the legislation was intended to get the attention of Baltimore County, as many residents have expressed concern over losing the 70-year-old Essex Skypark.
“Things are moving way too fast with this issue over something as historic as the Essex Skypark,” McDonough said. “Sometimes the only way to get people to listen in cases like this is by filing legislation.”
Vince Gardina, director of the county’s department of environmental protection and sustainability, said the county wants to clear the 40 acres of the skypark in order to meet federal pollutant mandates for the area, plant trees, protect birds, improve water quality along Back River, replace forests destroyed by other development in the county and help to mitigate other pollution issues along the Chesapeake Bay watershed.
Baltimore County has owned the property since 2000 when it purchased 500 acres from the Shapiro family for $2.1 million through the Maryland Environmental Trust, Gardina said. The Essex Skypark Association has signed a series of five-year leases with the county since then.
But when the association failed to renew its lease last year on time, Gardina said, that gave the county the opportunity to move forward with its plans for the skypark land. The county’s current plan is to allow the skypark association five years to find a place to relocate before taking over the property.
That plan is unacceptable to District 6 Del. Michael Weir Jr. The Essex Democrat said calls to close the skypark are “ridiculous” and that the county's move goes against the wishes of an easement signed between the Shapiro family and the county, which calls for the airport to remain on the site unless there is no activity there for a year.
Weir, along with fellow District 6 representatives Sen. Norman Stone and Dels. John Olszewski Jr. and Joseph “Sonny” Minnick, wrote to County Executive Kevin Kamenetz seeking additional information on the county’s stance on this issue.
“Because the Essex Skypark is an important part of local aviation history and a valuable commercial, recreational and safety asset, we urge you to halt the closure of the airport,” the letter read. “We acknowledge the need for a forest mitigation bank and pledge to work with you to find other alternatives other than the skypark site.”
Weir said he is also working on legislation, which would designate the Essex Skypark a state historical site. He also anticipates there eventually being a hearing in Annapolis on the future of the skypark where all solutions to the issue could be discussed.
“The Essex Skypark is a vital part of the history of eastern Baltimore County,” Weir said. “It’s also utilized by the fire department, police department and National Guard for training purposes in case it’s needed during an emergency or natural disaster. There has to be other answers to address forest mitigation needs.”
Tom Katzenberger, a Perry Hall pilot and member of the Essex Skypark Association, has been overwhelmed by the show of support from state lawmakers and the community, which includes people signing an online petition to save it. He said he hopes Baltimore County will now be more willing to work with the community in order to save the airport.
“This has been amazing to see how many people care about the future of the Essex Skypark,” Katzenberger said. “It’s a valuable resource not just for those in Essex, but for everyone in Baltimore County.
Keith Roberts
5:43 pm on Tuesday, January 31, 2012
Ron, the purchase money for the Skypark came from Rural Legacy Funds. not the Maryland Environmental Trust (MET). The MET does have an environmental easement on the property.
Keith
George Krach
6:14 pm on Tuesday, January 31, 2012
I'm in complete agreement with Pat and Rick. If it takes legislation to stop the county from closing the Essex Sky Park, so be it. Let's get behind Tom and the Aviators at Essex Sky Park, to save the last Skypark in Baltimore County, it's a worthly cause.
George Krach
9:06 pm on Tuesday, January 31, 2012
We know where our State Representatives stand on the issue of closing the Essex Skypark. What's the position of Councilwoman Bevins and Councilman Olszewski Sr. on the closing of the Skypark. Are they for it or against the closing. The citizens of their district's would like to know.
Clarice Neukam
7:56 am on Wednesday, February 1, 2012
Mr. Gardina wasn't worried about a NEW CONDO TOWNHOUSE complex in the general area! Now all of a sudden its the airport that he is so intent on targeting! Just like the closure of a small road off Hollyneck Rd. that when we have a disaster, such as Tropical Storm Lee last year, for the sake of another small housing development! When this road is CLOSED and we have trees and lines down we will now be cut off from everything. Most of us have generators but if you can't get out to get gas you have nothing. We are on the grinder pump system for sewage and when electric goes out you can't use interior water because if the grinder pump fills it'll overflow. Now isn't that going to be great for the Bay! There are treatment plant failures and what is done about that? Yet we as the tax payers pay the consequences and fines for supposed environment concerns. So therefore we will have no way to get out for days perhaps weeks. The utility lines still have not been correctly re-connected to a pole that broke off during the tropical storm. Numerous calls have gone ignored to correct this issue. I posted earlier that the County owns a 40 +/- acre farm about a mile from the air park they can use all of that for planting the trees, etc. There is more to this than what we are being told.
NO LEAVE THE AIR PARK ALONE!!!!
Keith Roberts
8:00 pm on Wednesday, February 1, 2012
What 40 acre farm are you talking about? Do you mean the 90 +/- acre property known as the Somogyi Farm? That farm (which you can read about in a column I wrote for Patch or contact me and I'll share the research I've done on the property) has been in agricultural use for more than 200 years.I for one, and I'm sure many others on the peninsula including the Zahradka family (who lease the property for crops) would like to see that property remain agricultural and NOT reforested
Ron Snyder
9:07 am on Wednesday, February 1, 2012
George: I've spoken with Councilwoman Bevins and will post an update story later today.
George Krach
2:07 pm on Wednesday, February 1, 2012
Thanks Ron.
Mark Takacs
10:48 am on Wednesday, February 1, 2012
Vince Gardina doesnt care about the skypark and he doesnt care about the Chesapeake Bay.........just like the govenor.......all he wants to do is meet a goal given too him about some other issue. In this case, he needs to get credits for some other environmental blunder. Just like the govenor using septic systems to control sprawl which does not allow him to balance a budget....nothing to do with the bay as stormwater is the real problem with the bay.
I have always wondered how new homes have never taken over most of the peninsula as I thought sewer hookups were available.
Besides this property, why have developers not taken over much of this land?
Clarice....you are right.....there is always more to the story. Unfortunatley, we only get the angle that the media want to run with.
Again, it has nothing to do with the environment.
No one really want to save the bay, it is too expensive and it will put many people out of business.......because what are we really going.......nothing?
Clarice Neukam
11:51 am on Wednesday, February 1, 2012
Mark, most of the land on the peninsula is RC5. Lot owners need to get variances to build anything or replace an existing dwelling for me that's fine. There was a committee that tried to to re-zone and create a Coastal Zone but that has been put on the back burner, which for now is good. That is another story. I too agree that Vince Gardina as with other politicians (not all) put their head in the sand when it comes to the issues with the Bay. It certainly is not septic systems. It's pollution from others states coming into the Susquehanna River from PA, New York and Delaware. It's also our own treatment plants, millions of gallons are periodically dumped because of failures. It's farms that have no sediment control as well as road construction run-off. Farms need burms or a trench dug around the entire area that is farmed but why do that just have the tax payer pay more $$ so they can waste even more money and say they still don't have enough.
Sorry for the long venting but all of this rubs me the wrong way with government wanting to take over everything. The Sky Park needs to get an Historical designation then the government couldn't touch it.
margie
12:26 pm on Wednesday, February 1, 2012
Everytime I see a small plane flying in the beautiful blue sky, it brings back childhood memories of Essex Skypark. I remember waiting anxiously with my six siblings for my turn to fly across the Chesapeake bay in my father's plane. It's amazing when I go there now and see my brothers fly their children and grandchilden on the same magical route. Essex Skypark is a real gem, a wonderful place to fly your plane, picnic, or just watch the planes soar overhead. Why would anyone want to take historical Essex Skypark away?
Keith Roberts
1:55 pm on Wednesday, February 1, 2012
The 580+/- acre Skypark Property was purchased with "Rural Legacy" funds. The Rural Legacy Program was established to specifically prohibit development. The Skypark property also has an "Easement" from the Maryland Environmental Trust protecting the forests and wetlands. The Back River Neck Peninsula Community Association (BRNPCA) has continually supported the operation of the Skypark. The "Lower Back River Neck Peninsula Community Action Plan" which is a part of the "Baltimore County Master Plan" specifically supports the continuation of the Skypark. As a former President of the BRNPCA, former Chairman of the Lower Back River Neck Peninsula Community Action Plan, and a community activist in the Essex Middle River community for more than 30 years, I want to go on record as stating that as long as I have a breath in my body, there will be NO RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT of the Skypark property. I have yet to find any evidence to substantiate these development rumors. I have, and will continue to support the operation of the Skypark, but I urge all interested parties to stick to the facts and not spread unfounded rumors. Finally, check the records...as a County Councilman, Vince Gardina downzoned and/or placed into preservation thousands of acres on the lower Back River Neck to limit and/or prohibit development.
Keith Roberts
2:06 pm on Wednesday, February 1, 2012
I have, and I am digging deeper. I was born and raised near the Skypark. As a child and young man I played, hunted, and spent overnight "camping adventures" on just about all of that property. The first job I ever had was working at the Skypark when it was operated by Earl and Lois Wilson. I took flying lessons there. As an adult and community activist I have spent countless years working to support the Skypark. I do not deny anyone the right to their oppinion. All I ask is that we seperate fact from fiction in regards to the property being developed.
Clarice Neukam
10:17 pm on Wednesday, February 1, 2012
Yes Keith I stand corrected on the Somogyi farms acreage, then are you saying the Sky Park is a better areas to reforest? If so then I really don't care what they do down here. Let them re-forest and tare down the Sky Park since there is no other area that trees can be planted. Re-foresting the farm is better than a few other things that were proposed and those proposals did not include farming, unfortunately. There is more run off from the farms that pollute the Bay than the Sky Park. But who cares anyway the County will do what they want to do. I'm done....
Keith Roberts
2:11 pm on Thursday, February 2, 2012
You obviously dont read my entire comments. I have for YEARS (not just recently) supported the continuation of the Skypark. I have NEVER said the Skypark is a good area to reforest