Olszewski: Explaining Vote on Same-Sex Marriage
Del. John Olszewski Jr. outlines his reasoning for voting "yes" on same-sex marriage after years of being opposed to it.
[Last week], the House of Delegates considered the Civil Marriage Protection Act, legislation that would grant same-sex couples access to a Maryland marriage certificate. I voted for this legislation, and wanted to take the time to explain why.
First, I would like to say that I am proud to be a Christian, and that my faith is important to me. As such, I have always tried to strike a balance between providing equal rights under the law and ensuring that religious freedoms remain wholly intact.
While members of my United Methodist church—and many communities—disagree over the issue of marriage equality, I could find no compelling reason to deny other individuals access to the same rights and responsibilities that are given to me and my wife by the state.
These are the same rights that the state continues to explicitly protect and provide to murderers and rapists. These are rights that are also given to non-believers and—despite warnings against it in Scripture—to those who have divorced and want to remarry.
How can we justify doing that as we deny these same basic rights to the business owners, police officers, and teachers that serve our community?
While I had favored civil unions as a way to convey these rights, I was surprised to see that even colleagues who professed to share this view acted to prevent exactly that—a civil union amendment failed, with 15 members of the House of Delegates choosing to not even cast a vote.
Due in large part to my efforts, the marriage legislation has some of the strongest religious protection language in the country. Churches and religious organizations are not required to perform marriages that contradict their beliefs, or provide services or accommodations that promote or celebrate a marriage that they do not believe in.
In fact, if anything, the legislation expands protections for people of faith relative to marriage and their sincerely held religious beliefs. These protections continue to allow faith communities to decide for themselves what is right or wrong relative to marriage – whatever the circumstance.
To go another day denying equal civil, state-sponsored rights to all Marylanders is wrong.
As with any other legislation considered by the General Assembly, residents have the option to petition the civil marriage law to the ballot for review by all voters.
I fully expect that to be the case with this law—and trust that the debate leading up to the 2012 vote will be robust yet respectful. There were good people on both sides of this issue in the Maryland General Assembly, just as I know there are good people on both sides of this issue within our communities.
In the meantime, the work of the state legislature continues—and where I will continue fighting to keep our environment clean, our schools funded, and our taxes low.
Note: Del. John Olzewski Jr. represents the Sixth District, which includes Dundalk and Essex.
Dezz30
8:22 am on Friday, February 24, 2012
Well said Sir. I applaud you for your courage in doing what is right and not simply what is politically expedient.
Jessica
9:01 am on Friday, February 24, 2012
thank you for posting this! Way to go Maryland!!! :)
John F.
9:33 am on Friday, February 24, 2012
This is a disgrace in the highest order! Your vote was politically expedient and I am sure the leadership and the Governor will reward you immensely for your vote. Once the 2010 returns came in, your party was salivating at the prospect of getting this legislation enacted and the heck with civil unions I am disappointed but not surprised. Thanks to you and others we are left with the referendum process that will probably result in an activist court overturning the will of Marylanders. There is a right way (civil union)and a wrong way (gay MARRIAGE) to get this "civil rights" issue addressed, you Sir, choose the latter.
Jay GRabowski
9:46 am on Friday, February 24, 2012
Nothing but back door/room politics. You did your best to apease O'Malley, who cares nothing more other than padding his resume for his run for the Corrupt House in 2016. Did he promoise you a Cabinent Position Olzewski, for your vote???
Matthew
10:38 am on Friday, February 24, 2012
Still looking for an update from Stone, Minnick, or Wier... I applaud not only the rationale for the vote, but the willingness to man up and say, "Here's why I did what I did." Though I disagree with "gay marriage" personally, I see it differently as a legal issue. That said, I very much appreciate the vote and more so, the communication with the constituency.
As a conservative, I'm glad they voted to stop regulating people's personal lives.
Marybeth M
2:40 pm on Friday, February 24, 2012
I don't disagree with gay marriage personally, but I totally agree with everything else in this post. I appreciate the rational on the vote and communication with the public!
kevin
10:55 am on Friday, February 24, 2012
Funny that the here's why I did it excuse is used by all the democrats across the nation on this issue. again I'm not against this bill I'm against your betrayal .Why did you make it a campaign issue then turn around and change.Because you and all the other democratic future of Maryland were told to .You were given a script saw the same rehearsed testimony.Did you even bother to check if these people were telling the truth. Nothing has changed since Staten and Birmingham in Dundalk except the quality of life has hit the bottom. Because of sell outs like you Johnny .
Dan Liberatore
3:41 pm on Friday, February 24, 2012
Rights given by the states? Maybe that is why the state has so many problems!
"...that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain
unalienable Rights,..." If the state could give rights, then the state can take them away. We, all of us, are born with our rights. Our rights are not granted to us by any state.
Portsmouth Citizen
4:22 pm on Friday, February 24, 2012
Dan: if you are going to quote a source document as a basis for our rights, please cite the Constitution. The Declaration of Independence which you cite, while deeply meaningful, is not the basis of our American legal system.
And, if you think the state can't take away your rights, ask anyone who is in prison.
Portsmouth Citizen
4:20 pm on Friday, February 24, 2012
Your explanation comes as no surprise to me because I have always known that there is "no compelling reason to deny other individuals access to the same rights and responsibilities that are given to me and my wife by the state."
What puzzles me is why so many others, so very many, just don't understand the meaning of the legal term, equal protection of the law.
amdactivist
7:06 am on Saturday, February 25, 2012
port. nothing moral or legal about 2 men or 2 women? Might as well let my 2 dogs get married..
Roxane
6:49 pm on Friday, February 24, 2012
I am disappointed, not in the bill, but that you lied to the people who put you in office. That's more of an issue than the 5% of the population who will benefit from this bill.
Dan Liberatore
8:28 pm on Friday, February 24, 2012
Point well taken Portsmouth!
amdactivist
7:05 am on Saturday, February 25, 2012
one less democrat i'll vote for..
chuck
8:03 am on Saturday, February 25, 2012
Thanks for legalizing Sodomy.
Maria Grafton
9:39 am on Saturday, February 25, 2012
Well if you were such Christian sir, you would know what your Bible says about homosexuals AND marriage! Then you would not have seen no good reason to first against it! The separation of church and state is why immorality is high on the rise! I don't care for anyone's remarks again my comments as one day, everyone's eye shall be opened to the truth!
Maria Grafton
9:39 am on Saturday, February 25, 2012
*that was vote against it
Larry W. Smith
9:51 am on Saturday, February 25, 2012
It has been my understanding that you were elected to represent the views of your constituents, not force your opinions on them. You have betrayed te trust of the people you were suppose to represent. You appear to be just another political whore selling your vote for your own political ambitions.
fred
12:40 pm on Saturday, February 25, 2012
he did represent my views. it sounds like if its not your view then its wrong for everyone
Len Shindel
12:08 pm on Saturday, February 25, 2012
Thank you for your courage. Our state and nation need to be big enough to accept the humanity and rights of all to love and marry. Now let's support our legislators by approving this bill so they can move forward and help to address jobs and building a fairer economy!
Sharon Cosner
12:29 pm on Saturday, February 25, 2012
Well I am a Christian and my Bible states that marriage is between one man and one woman. Read the scripture and it is very plain in stating this.
Leviticus 18:22 states: you shall not lie with a man as with a woman
In Genesis chapter 2: the Bible states that a man shall leave his father and mother and they will be united, and they will become one.
Hebrews 13:4 states: Marriage should be honored by all, and the marriage bed kept pure for God will judge the adulterer and all the sexual immoral.
Other scriptures include: Genesis 2:24, Mark 10:9, Ephesians 5:22-33, Proverbs 18:22, I Timothy 5:14
JUST SAYING!!! God said it, We believe it
Jim and Sharon Cosner
fred
12:38 pm on Saturday, February 25, 2012
if you want law ruled by religion then iran is the place to be. move on.
Jimmy Thompson
2:10 pm on Monday, February 27, 2012
That being the case, I'm sure you'd also then agree that the state should not allowed those who divorce to get married again. Or, for that matter, the state should require the following, also in the bible:
Don't let cattle graze with other kinds of Cattle (Leviticus 19:19)
Don't have a variety of crops on the same field. (Leviticus 19:19)
Don't wear clothes made of more than one fabric (Leviticus 19:19)
Don't cut your hair nor shave. (Leviticus 19:27)
Any person who curseth his mother or father, must be killed. (Leviticus 20:9) If a man cheats on his wife, or vise versa, both the man and the woman must die. (Leviticus 20:10).
If a man sleeps with his father's wife... both him and his father's wife is to be put to death. (Leviticus 20:11)
If a man sleeps with his wife and her mother they are all to be burnt to death. (Leviticus 20:14)
Giggles
8:01 am on Thursday, March 1, 2012
Sharon, people who are doing wrong and living in SAtans world love what they do and no matter the facts of the truth as you have stated... people are going to go there own way.. I agree with you as I too am a christian but there are so many as you can tell that are professed christians that don't know the meaning of the words they speak.. they have to read the bible and I'm sure they don't as if they did they would know.. 2 Tim 3: 1-5 tells of our day and age.. the people doing wrong are having there reward now. When the true reward comes they won't be around.. sad
Patrice
4:51 pm on Saturday, March 10, 2012
Does the same Bible find that it's OK for the same men and women to divorce and remarry over and over again? Or for men to molest little boys. Or that it's OK to cheat on you husband/wife? or steal or rape or lie or or I don't care what people do behind closed doors. Unless you're peeking you shouldn't either.
Butch Jansen
2:52 pm on Saturday, February 25, 2012
People there is NO CONSITUTIONAL RIGHT of marriage! It is a privilege bestowed upon a man and woman by the states and made lawfully legitimate for other reasons. Secondly, the Supreme Court needs to address the proper definition of "marriage" that comports with our country's original judeo-christian beliefs that supports a proper family unit and the procreation of life. Two men and/or two women cannot procreate another life without the use of outside intervention due to obvious biological and anatomical reasons. Though I'm a Roman Catholic and the gay lifestyle is not acceptable to our religious beliefs, I do accept the right of other people to be with whom they wish but I draw the line at gay marriage. I would be amenable to "civil unions" for the purposes of other reasons like health insurance, etc.. Marriage as an institution should be reserved for and restricted to a man and a woman. Our liberal society has slowly eroded our moral fabric of this country to shameless depths that now people are demanding we accept polygamy! America, what's next? Incest! Its time that we demand of our elected politicians that they convey the will of the majority and not minority! Again, marriage is not a constitutionally protected right.....
Adrian Stone
4:30 am on Friday, April 13, 2012
Aside from religious conflicts, why should gay people be denied the rights of straight people?
Sounds to me you skipped over the First Amendment/
Brad Metheny
8:18 am on Sunday, February 26, 2012
I myself am more concerned that the majority was grossly misrepresented by the support and passing of this bill. I believe that when this bill goes to referendum, as it most likely will, then the public's true feelings will be made loud and clear.
Adrian Stone
4:27 am on Friday, April 13, 2012
Thankfully, the Constitution was designed to protect the minority from the majority, so one day ALL may be treated equally regardless of religion, sexuality, color, political beliefs, etc...
amdactivist
8:33 am on Sunday, February 26, 2012
Do you know the kind fo bribing our own governor does? Actually he threatens the elected officials under him with his power. They lose out. More and more speaking out against him. Why do you think omalley made a complete turn around on his gay marriage stance? all about the votes.. He's moving on to higher ground.. anybody remember omalley saying "lies win elections"?
Don Twine
1:07 pm on Monday, February 27, 2012
Butch, please don't refer to being gay as a "lifestyle". It is not a choice. Why would I choose it if I had to deal with the long list of problems like bullying, religious unacceptance, possible job firing, etc etc? And I have news for you - there are hundreds if not thousands of gay couples in this state and more across the country who have been living their lives as married couples already and MANY with children. We are american families just like yours dealing with the same day-to-day challenges as your family. I have been with my partner for 13 years. More than many legal marriages last. We own a home together. We plan on adopting children, which is doable in Maryland. (I guess under your rule barren or elderly straight couples or ones that don't want to have children shouldn't get married either) All we ask is that we are treated under the LAW the same way as everyone else. The churches don't have to be involved at all - the law takes that into account. And there is such a thing as minority rights in this country. We take up 10% of the population - I think thats a sizable minority. And BRAD - a majority should NEVER have the rights to decide the fate of a minority. That one of the reasons we have representatives to hear all sides and make educated decisions. Referendums are good for some laws, but this one deals with a minority's rights, which should not be decided by a majority -many of whom are biased because of religion or ignorance to the actual language of the law.
Don Twine
1:09 pm on Monday, February 27, 2012
correction - language of the "bill". apologies.
Don Twine
1:11 pm on Monday, February 27, 2012
And to Del. John Olszewski - thank you. You DO represent my needs, and many others.
Joan Wood
2:44 pm on Saturday, March 3, 2012
Tell us the REAL reason Delegate............isn't Senator Stone thinking of retiring? What a feather in your cap if you could be "appointed" to that position! Politics as usual in Maryland............
Shell9
4:51 pm on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
I agree!!!!! He did it the first time when he became the delegate and took over john Arnick's seat..He will do it again. He has not done anything for Dundalk. Wake up!!! Dundalk is the butt of every Baltimore County Joke. Our Neighborhoods are over run by rats and rift raft. Our businesses are declining. WE need Change. DUNDALK stop voting for these candidates just because your parents voted for them. VOTE your independence...VOTE FOR CHANGE....
Graham
11:19 pm on Friday, March 9, 2012
I am a straight, white man that supports marriage equality. There are lots of other people in this town that do, too.
As a veteran, I think about the young men and women who are fighting and dying for our country. Yet, if opponents of marriage equality had their way, these brave soldiers would not have the same protections of the law that they are defending for straight people! I am glad that Del. Olszewski had the courage to vote to protect our veterans and others in the community. Just seeing that Marine come home from a War Zone and kiss his partner on the mouth was enough for me. One cannot help who they Love. I for one do not feel that anyone has the right to deny me the right to love my Darling Patty, nor should anyone deny a person that very same right, and that right means marriage to anyone who feels the need.
In addition to being the right thing to do, I am glad that the General Assembly passed the law because it is now able to focus on other issues that are important to our community and the state. This issue would continue to be a distraction if it were not passed – it would be something the legislature would keep taking up, and would only detract from other issues. Passing the bill and having it on referendum is the only and best way to finally get beyond this.
Because of the referendum, the people are going to decide! Who can be against that?
Shell9
11:19 pm on Monday, April 2, 2012
Please don't kid yourself by saying your a christian, but feels the need to vote for same sex marriages.. Clearly you must be reading a different bible!! You voted the way you wanted to,, not the way the voters who put you there wanted. Your initial appointment to office was one of those back room deals, so I don't believe that you really have any integrity. You represent US!!! Don't think you can go to Annapolis and vote what you and your wife believe in. I don't think I could ever attend your church..Can't imagine that they follow God and his teachings. I will work hard to make sure you are not re-elected...We will defeat this. You really disappoint me and the voters who put you there. In fact, DUNDALK we need to clean house. Look at how poorly Dundalk is progressing?? These clowns have been in there for years and we haven't seen any improvements. Dundalk deserves better than this. We are a great community and need GREAT Representation.
Adrian Stone
4:36 am on Friday, April 13, 2012
The Bible states that the Lord gave mankind a choice: be ruled by Him, or by their fellow men. We chose our fellow men.
The Constitution states....yadda, yadda, yadda.
As for Dundalk; DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT! Stop expecting the government to do everything for you and invest in local businesses, start a community group which WILL do something. I mean, you kinda sound like a.......Socialist.
James Smith
12:57 pm on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
Same sex marriage
Next Humans marrried to animals.
Next Humans having sex with babies.
Why? because every person has the right to be happy. But the baby didn't cry and the animal never cried. Sick.
Adrian Stone
4:37 am on Friday, April 13, 2012
Well, you are either a complete idiot or a complete moron.
I think maybe a bit of both.
Shell9
2:57 pm on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
So I issue a challenge to all of Dundalk's great citizens. Say NO to a "Lack of progress in our area." Say NO to our "declining businesses." Say NO to "Our declining Neighborhoods." VOTE FOR REAL CHANGE ON ELECTION DAY!!!!! Clean House. Vote your needs,wants,desires for DUNDALK and our STATE...NOT PARTY LINES..
amdactivist
5:10 am on Friday, April 13, 2012
Adrian.. you quote the bible and you call people idiots and morons all in same breath.
a marriage consist of man and woman only.. what the others do in the bedroom is their own business yet all they want to do is tell the world they love something other then their opposite and smith is right.. what next animals? nothing sick about it.. just truth.